For discussion of politics, and what's going on in the world today.
Moderators: Gallstones, Darwinsbulldog
by Fastin » Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:55 pm
I post this because it was brought up on another forum. I'm curious to here the thoughts of my fellow RD.net members.
Is this just a last ditch ploy to muddy the waters, or does this issue have traction. I have been told that the case is being seen before the supreme court. I'm attempting to find non-biased information about the case.
Thoughts?
-

Fastin
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 7:48 am
by ScholasticSpastic » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:03 pm
He was born in Hawaii, so yes. Hawaii is a State in the Union and so everyone born there is a natural born citizen of the United States. Is there really any argument about his citizenship status?

"You've got to be a real asshole to quote yourself."
~ScholasticSpastic
-

ScholasticSpastic
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 7291
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:35 am
- Location: USA, UT
by Arnaud » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:04 pm
ScholasticSpastic wrote:He was born in Hawaii, so yes. Hawaii is a State in the Union and so everyone born there is a natural born citizen of the United States. Is there really any argument about his citizenship status?

Fox News tried there best.

“Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore.” - Andre Gide
-

Arnaud
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 2:55 am
- Location: Belgium
by besleybean » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:04 pm
No, cos otherwise he couldn't be president.
This product is a work in progress.
-

besleybean
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 14349
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:37 pm
- Location: Carnoustie, Angus, Scotland
-
by Fastin » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:07 pm
I'm referring to the numerous lawsuits being filed throughout the country, including one Philly attorney who is appealing his frivolous lawsuit to the Supreme Court. I fully understand that he says that he was born in Hawaii, etc.
Others are claiming that his certification is forged, etc.
Granted I disagree.
-

Fastin
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 7:48 am
by ScholasticSpastic » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:09 pm
Arnaud wrote:ScholasticSpastic wrote:He was born in Hawaii, so yes. Hawaii is a State in the Union and so everyone born there is a natural born citizen of the United States. Is there really any argument about his citizenship status?

Fox News tried there best.

I hope Hawaii set them straight.
If I were Hawaiian, I'd be trying to put together a class-action suit against Faux News for defammation or some-such. While the media must be protected from frivolous law suits, they should also be taken to task, legally and financially, when a case can be made demonstrating a grievous pattern of falsehood. I'm confident such a case could be made against Faux News.
"You've got to be a real asshole to quote yourself."
~ScholasticSpastic
-

ScholasticSpastic
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 7291
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:35 am
- Location: USA, UT
by ScholasticSpastic » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:12 pm
Fastin wrote:I'm referring to the numerous lawsuits being filed throughout the country, including one Philly attorney who is appealing his frivolous lawsuit to the Supreme Court. I fully understand that he says that he was born in Hawaii, etc.
Others are claiming that his certification is forged, etc.
Granted I disagree.
Obama raised a lot of money. I think countersuits are in order here- for sums large enough to pay for court costs and spank the cranks who filed the cases.
"You've got to be a real asshole to quote yourself."
~ScholasticSpastic
-

ScholasticSpastic
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 7291
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:35 am
- Location: USA, UT
by Kevin Ronayne » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:19 pm
Hawaii: became a state of the Union on August 21, 1959.
President-elect

Barack Obama: born August 4, 1961, Honolulu.
... not so much as a crumb of hope for the crackpots.

God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers
I have done the state some service, and they know't. - Othello, Act 5, Sc. II
That he which hath no stomach to this fight, let him depart - Henry V, Act 4, Sc. III
-

Kevin Ronayne
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 11821
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:23 pm
- Location: Ireland
by Fastin » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:21 pm
Agreed.
I fully understand said certificate has been provided, along with outlets verifying the veracity of the document. However that isn't stopping the rabid devotion to the cause, namely the lawsuits being filed that claim it's fake/photo shopped/manipulated etc.
I suppose I shouldn't expect much from the other side, considering their definition of truth.
-

Fastin
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 7:48 am
by Samantha » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:43 pm
I won't waste my time with accusation that the birth cert is a forgery, others have already debunked it. What does puzzle me though about the people who make this accusation is - what do they hope to achieve? Do they think it will roll back their electoral defeat and give them victory??
My understanding of US law is that if Obama were disqualified at this stage, Joe Biden would become President Elect. Are they really that keen to see Biden in the White House?
-

Samantha
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 3876
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 9:57 pm
-
by Fastin » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:00 pm
Samantha wrote:My understanding of US law is that if Obama were disqualified at this stage, Joe Biden would become President Elect. Are they really that keen to see Biden in the White House?
As long as it isn't the muslim, liberal, black man sure. Personally, I feel they are looking for any slight "victory" they can get, and this in their twisted minds would be a victory.
-

Fastin
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 7:48 am
by TBickle » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:18 pm
I post this because it was brought up on another forum. I'm curious to here the thoughts of my fellow RD.net members.
Is this just a last ditch ploy to muddy the waters, or does this issue have traction. I have been told that the case is being seen before the supreme court. I'm attempting to find non-biased information about the case.
Thoughts?
Coadie?
JimMet?
"To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead."
- Thomas Paine
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin
-

TBickle
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 4011
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 2:06 pm
by WordNerd » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:37 pm
This "lawyer" is named Berg. He's also suing because he believes the US Government committed the 9/11 attacks.
He's a kook.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson
-

WordNerd
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: CA
-
by mindcrime » Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:59 pm
It seems that Hillary or McCain would have gotten to the bottom of that in order to benefit themselves months ago.
-

mindcrime
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:11 pm
by WordNerd » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:07 pm
http://www.rinf.com/columnists/news/phi ... uth-of-911Check this guy out. Anyone who trusts anything he says he has "proof" of is off their rocker.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson
-

WordNerd
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: CA
-
by Matt H. » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:09 pm
It's funny how so many of these 'Bushdidit' conspiracy theorists also think Bush is a dumbfuck.... yet he managed to pull off one of the most ingenious conspiracies in history... after all, the whole world bought it.
"I think it is damned unlikely that anything like a central cosmic will, a spirit world, or an eternal survival of personality exist. In theory I am an agnostic, but pending the appearance of radical evidence I must be classed, practically and provisionally, as an atheist."
H P Lovecraft
-

Matt H.
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 3:38 pm
- Location: UK
by PurpleRat » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:14 pm
He was born in Hawaii, so yes. Hawaii is a State in the Union and so everyone born there is a natural born citizen of the United States. Is there really any argument about his citizenship status?
Even more importantly than his place of birth is the fact that his mother is a natural born US citizen which guarantees him citizenship. If place of birth were actually an issue it's McCain who would come under scrutiny as he was born in Panama. But it's a non-issue. My sister in-law was born and raised in a foreign country yet there is absolutely no question about her citizenship because her parents are US citizens.
Return to Atheism - For some reason after reading through a long thread this link at the bottom of the page always brings a little happiness to my day.
-

PurpleRat
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 3:29 am
- Location: USA
by PurpleRat » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:18 pm
It's funny how so many of these 'Bushdidit' conspiracy theorists also think Bush is a dumbfuck.... yet he managed to pull off one of the most ingenious conspiracies in history... after all, the whole world bought it.
Agreed. As much as I hate Bush (the president, not vaginas) the key evidence that he had nothing to do with 9/11 is that it was a well thought-out plan that actually worked. There is no evidence over the past eight years that the Bush administration has done anything like that.
Return to Atheism - For some reason after reading through a long thread this link at the bottom of the page always brings a little happiness to my day.
-

PurpleRat
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 3:29 am
- Location: USA
by WordNerd » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:21 pm
PurpleRat wrote:He was born in Hawaii, so yes. Hawaii is a State in the Union and so everyone born there is a natural born citizen of the United States. Is there really any argument about his citizenship status?
Even more importantly than his place of birth is the fact that his mother is a natural born US citizen which guarantees him citizenship. If place of birth were actually an issue it's McCain who would come under scrutiny as he was born in Panama. But it's a non-issue. My sister in-law was born and raised in a foreign country yet there is absolutely no question about her citizenship because her parents are US citizens.
That's actually incorrect. If he wasn't born on US soil, he would have to be born of TWO citizens or ONE who is currently in the military or working for the federal government.
But he was born in Hawaii, so it's a non-issue.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson
-

WordNerd
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: CA
-
by coadie » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:45 pm
That is a word processor knock off. It is NOT a certificate of live birth.
-
coadie
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:55 pm
by saaweeet » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:46 pm
Shit, coadie's back?
"The most beautiful and deepest experience a man can have is the sense of the mysterious. To sense that behind anything that can be experienced there is something that our mind cannot grasp and whose beauty and sublimity reaches us only indirectly and as a feeble reflection, this is religiousness. In this sense I am religious." A.Einstein
-

saaweeet
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:00 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
by WordNerd » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:49 pm
coadie wrote:That is a word processor knock off. It is NOT a certificate of live birth.
But the Republican governor of Hawaii verified that his live birth certificate is in the government's possession there, and Hawaii state law says that only family members can request such a document. You're following the rantings of a proven nutjob.
"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." -- Thomas Jefferson
-

WordNerd
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: CA
-
by coadie » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:56 pm
WordNerd wrote:coadie wrote:That is a word processor knock off. It is NOT a certificate of live birth.
But the Republican governor of Hawaii verified that his live birth certificate is in the government's possession there, and Hawaii state law says that only family members can request such a document. You're following the rantings of a proven nutjob.
You folks seem to not be up to date. there is a court case tomorrow the 18th.
http://www.contrariancommentary.com/community/Home/tabid/36/mid/363/newsid363/317/Default.aspx
Martin has researched Obama for several years now. We have a lot of info from Chicago. No one seems to know what is on the certificate of Live birth that hinders Obama from showing it. Of course it has a doc signature and some detail he doesn't want exposed. I hear he has to show it by december 1 for the SCOTUS.
-
coadie
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:55 pm
by saaweeet » Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:59 pm
"The most beautiful and deepest experience a man can have is the sense of the mysterious. To sense that behind anything that can be experienced there is something that our mind cannot grasp and whose beauty and sublimity reaches us only indirectly and as a feeble reflection, this is religiousness. In this sense I am religious." A.Einstein
-

saaweeet
- Forum Member
-
- Posts: 1100
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:00 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Return to Politics & Current Affairs
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AndreD, andyx1205, BrandySpears, Dag Erik, Darren8306, DoctorE, Egbert, entheogensmurf, Joe09, Kaleid, Michael91, Notfor Prophet, Paul Almond, PhiloKGB, pragmatist45, psychoserenity, Psycosmo, sandinista, Sneakers O'Toole, Toontown, Tortured_Genius, Warren Dew and 41 guests