Login  •  Register

Go to RichardDawkins.net | Store | OUT Campaign | Disclaimer | Search the Forum | E-Mail Forum Admin

Theory or Fact?

This section is for discussions about the books of Richard Dawkins. The Selfish Gene, The Extended Phenotype, The Blind Watchmaker, River Out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, Unweaving the Rainbow, A Devil's Chaplain, The Ancestor's Tale, The God Delusion, The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing, and The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

Moderator: Ilovelucy

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby z8000783 » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:24 pm

mizvekov wrote:
z8000783 wrote:Thank God that's sorted then.

John

What's sorted? You communicate yourself quite enigmatically.

Do you mean enigmatically or mysteriously?

John
No matter how strong the belief is that you have or how many people believe the same things that you believe or that they have believed those things for a very long time, it makes absolutely no difference as to whether something is true or not.
z8000783
Forum Member
 
Posts: 2999
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: London & Kranidi, Greece

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby mizvekov » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:27 pm

z8000783 wrote:
mizvekov wrote:
z8000783 wrote:Thank God that's sorted then.

John

What's sorted? You communicate yourself quite enigmatically.

Do you mean enigmatically or mysteriously?

John

Hmm, ambiguously would be a better term I think.
User avatar
mizvekov
Forum Member
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:15 am
Location: Brazil

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby C Marxer » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:13 am

TBickle wrote:C Marxer, you are obviously not keeping up with science if you think we haven't observed evolution in action. There has been a wonderful experiment done with E. Coli I suggest you look into.

If you are familiar with it but are going to try and use the micro/macro argument, I will also recommend that you stop eating the BS people are feeding and switch to another argument and save yourself the discomfort of having thia torn to shreds in the worst manner.

Are truths not facts?


TBickle: All facts are truths - "false fact" is a contradiction - but not all truths are facts. "The WTC in New York was attacked on 9/11" is a fact and is therefore true. "Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" may be true, but it's not a fact.
C Marxer
Newbie
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby mizvekov » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:20 am

C Marxer wrote:
TBickle wrote:C Marxer, you are obviously not keeping up with science if you think we haven't observed evolution in action. There has been a wonderful experiment done with E. Coli I suggest you look into.

If you are familiar with it but are going to try and use the micro/macro argument, I will also recommend that you stop eating the BS people are feeding and switch to another argument and save yourself the discomfort of having thia torn to shreds in the worst manner.

Are truths not facts?


TBickle: All facts are truths - "false fact" is a contradiction - but not all truths are facts. "The WTC in New York was attacked on 9/11" is a fact and is therefore true. "Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" may be true, but it's not a fact.

Quite a lay person definition of fact.
"Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" is a fact because there is so much evidence in favor of that, that it would be perverse not to call it a fact.
Same thing as the WTC really, probably to different degrees of easiness of assessment.
User avatar
mizvekov
Forum Member
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:15 am
Location: Brazil

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby IamthereforeIthink » Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:21 am

This issue (Evolution: Theory or Fact) has already been dealt with in detail in this thread
'Because he's got flies in his eyes,' Orr explained with exaggerated patience. 'How
can he see he's got flies in his eyes if he's got flies in his eyes?'

- from "Catch 22" by Joseph Heller
User avatar
IamthereforeIthink
Forum Member
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:58 pm
Location: Boston, MA, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe, Multiverse, ?

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby aspire1670 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:47 am

C Marxer wrote:
TBickle wrote:C Marxer, you are obviously not keeping up with science if you think we haven't observed evolution in action. There has been a wonderful experiment done with E. Coli I suggest you look into.

If you are familiar with it but are going to try and use the micro/macro argument, I will also recommend that you stop eating the BS people are feeding and switch to another argument and save yourself the discomfort of having thia torn to shreds in the worst manner.

Are truths not facts?


TBickle: All facts are truths - "false fact" is a contradiction - but not all truths are facts. "The WTC in New York was attacked on 9/11" is a fact and is therefore true. "Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" may be is true, but it's not and is therefore a fact.


Fixed those for you. By the way, in Sydney, Australia, the WTC were attacked on 10/11. This is a fact and is therefore also true. Facts are tricky rascals, Chas, especially in your hands.
Dunsapy wrote: Yes or No. My answer was to research both, at the same time.
aspire1670
Forum Member
 
Posts: 2536
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:52 pm

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby hotshoe » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:09 am

aspire1670 wrote:
C Marxer wrote:
TBickle wrote:C Marxer, you are obviously not keeping up with science if you think we haven't observed evolution in action. There has been a wonderful experiment done with E. Coli I suggest you look into.

If you are familiar with it but are going to try and use the micro/macro argument, I will also recommend that you stop eating the BS people are feeding and switch to another argument and save yourself the discomfort of having thia torn to shreds in the worst manner.

Are truths not facts?


TBickle: All facts are truths - "false fact" is a contradiction - but not all truths are facts. "The WTC in New York was attacked on 9/11" is a fact and is therefore true. "Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" may be is true, but it's not and is therefore a fact.


Fixed those for you. By the way, in Sydney, Australia, the WTC were attacked on 10/11. This is a fact and is therefore also true. Facts are tricky rascals, Chas, especially in your hands.


:mrgreen:
Johann Hari: "I respect you as a person too much to respect your ludicrous beliefs"
User avatar
hotshoe
Forum Member
 
Posts: 7338
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:04 am

Re: Theory or Fact?

Postby Teuton » Mon Nov 09, 2009 4:17 am

C Marxer wrote:TBickle: All facts are truths - "false fact" is a contradiction - but not all truths are facts. "The WTC in New York was attacked on 9/11" is a fact and is therefore true. "Fish evolved into land animals millions of years ago" may be true, but it's not a fact.


Yes, according to one (philosophical) definition, facts are truths, i.e. true propositions, such that the phrase "false fact", meaning "false true proposition", certainly is a contradiction in terms. But even according to that definition, "fact" doesn't mean "proposition known to be true". Even though "p is known to be true" implies "p is true", "p is true" doesn't imply "p is known to be true":

1. Kp –> p
2. ~(p –> Kp)
"The basic reality is the totality of actually existing matter in the process of becoming."
(David Bohm)
User avatar
Teuton
Forum Member
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:30 am
Location: Germany

Previous

Return to Books by Richard Dawkins

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MagPie [Crawler] and 5 guests


Go to RichardDawkins.net Store | OUT Campaign | Disclaimer | E-Mail Forum Admin