Moderator: Ilovelucy
Spinozasgalt wrote:Silent.Bomber wrote:(Might just about manage 400 before the end of the year).
That would be cool. How many people could say they've read 400 books in a year?

Some_Random_Chick wrote:Spinozasgalt wrote:Silent.Bomber wrote:(Might just about manage 400 before the end of the year).
That would be cool. How many people could say they've read 400 books in a year?
Many people won't read that many books in their entire lifetime . . . I like to call those people 'Americans.'


Stevie_B wrote:
- The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo
Anwyl wrote:Stevie_B wrote:
- The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo
I have had this sitting on my shelf for a couple of months, is it worth reading?



Stevie_B wrote:Anwyl wrote:Stevie_B wrote:
- The Lucifer Effect by Philip Zimbardo
I have had this sitting on my shelf for a couple of months, is it worth reading?
I found the first half of the book quite interesting. Zimbardo gives an in depth look
at the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). It was amazing to follow the changes which occurred in the participants,
including Zimbardo himself, as the experiment continued.
The 2nd half of the book focuses on Abu Ghraib. I'm not saying this section of the book isn't interesting but
the situational conditions surrounding Abu Ghraib make it easier to understand how abuses could occur.
In comparison, the relatively safe and voluntary conditions of the SPE and the behaviour which follows leaves one scratching their head. Definitely worth the read. There is also a movie about the SPEdue for release in 2011. If you're interested, Zimbardo also delivers a short lecture on the SPE which can be found on TED.TV.

Spinozasgalt wrote:
Ugh, I'm looking at Ian McEwan's Atonement and thinking "Boy I'd like to read that again right now", but nah, I'll read it again next year.
Silent.Bomber wrote:Spinozasgalt wrote:
Ugh, I'm looking at Ian McEwan's Atonement and thinking "Boy I'd like to read that again right now", but nah, I'll read it again next year.
I think ''ugh'' whenever I look at a book by Ian McEwan in general.

Spinozasgalt wrote:Silent.Bomber wrote:Spinozasgalt wrote:
Ugh, I'm looking at Ian McEwan's Atonement and thinking "Boy I'd like to read that again right now", but nah, I'll read it again next year.
I think ''ugh'' whenever I look at a book by Ian McEwan in general.
You're not wrong. Very few of his books bear rereading too. Atonement was the first I read of his books and I consider it his best. Elsewhere he's pretty predictable and somewhat dry too.
Silent.Bomber wrote:I think the first book of his I read was ''The Cement Garden'' which seemed a bit too sick for me. Then I read ''The Comfort of Strangers'' which must be the only novel I have ever read which made me feel genuinely ill. Then it was ''Enduring Love'' and ''On Chesil Beach'', two of the most contrived novels I have ever read. I capped this with the Booker Prize-winning ''Amsterdam'' which is one of the worst novellas I have ever read. So, I can't really say that I'm a fan: I don't plan on ever reading any of his books again.





Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests